| Prudent that sentences for multiple offences run concurrently to avoid double jeopardy and double punishment; consequently, the fine shall also run concurrently: Hon’ble Supreme Court of India |
Hemraj vs The State of Himachal Pradesh (Criminal Appeal)
|
| Even a single instance of award of public work through a process tainted by conflict of interest, or by a deliberate bypass of competition, constitutes an affront to Article 14: Hon'ble Supreme Court of India |
Save Mon Region Federation vs The State of Arunachal Pradesh (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 54 of 2024)
|
| Cheating Requires Fraudulent Intent at the Time of Inducement; Mere Non-Performance of Promise Insufficient: Hon'ble Supreme Court of India |
V Ganesan vs State Rep by the Sub Inspector of Police & Anr (Criminal Appeal No. 1470 of 2026)
|
| Non-Compliance with Section 50 NDPS Act Vitiates Trial: Hon’ble Supreme Court of India |
The State of Himachal Pradesh vs Surat Singh (Criminal Appeal No. 96 of 2018)
|
| Need for Adherence to Rajnesh Case Guidelines for assessing maintenance: Hon'ble Supreme Court of India |
Aditi Alias Mithi vs Jitesh Sharma (Criminal Appeal No. 3443 of 2023)
|
| Guidelines and Directions of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India for conduct of Civil Execution Proceedings |
Periyammal (Dead) Through LRS & Ors. vs V. Rajamani & Anr. etc (Civil Appeal Nos. 3640-3642 of 2025)
|
| Reconsider convictions based on age, time served, and the specifics of the incident: Hon'ble Supreme Court of India |
Ashok Saxena v. The State of Uttarakhand etc (Criminal Appeal Nos.1704-1705/2015)
|
| If there is any lapse by prosecutors, trial judges should play an active role in evidence process : Hon’ble Supreme Court of India |
Anees versus The State Govt. of NCT (Criminal Appeal No. 437 of 2015)
|
| Directive on Compliance with Police Reports and Legal Procedures under Section 173(2) of Cr.P.C.: Hon'ble Supreme Court of India |
Dablu Kujur versus The State of Jharkhand (Criminal Appeal no. 1511 of 2024)
|
| The Police cannot be allowed to tutor the prosecution witness: Hon'ble Supreme Court of India |
Manikandan versus State by the Inspector of Police (Criminal Appeal No. 1609 of 2011)
|